The missing bridge between
Claude and Word for legal drafting.

No. DocketDrafter works with firms that are already using Claude and firms that are just getting started. We configure the initial workflow and provide live one-to-one or group training for attorneys and staff. We also offer free attorney-focused education on files, context, PDFs, research, and drafting.

Claude can draft, but it does not have your firm's house style, prior matter history, formatting rules, reusable examples, citation review, version control, or Word output. Claude Projects and shared folders are good personal starting points. DocketDrafter turns that idea into maintained firm infrastructure with done-for-you setup, shared across the firm, version history, and court-specific formatting.

Firm plans start at $500 per month. Done-for-you setup and priority support are included, and the first month has a 30-day money-back guarantee. Your firm brings its own Claude subscription.

At minimum, tell us the jurisdiction where you practice and the court documents you prepare. We can begin with standard templates for supported courts. If you have preferred Word samples or official forms, send those too. You can start with one document and add more over time.

No. Word remains the review surface your lawyers and co-counsel already know. Edit text, use Track Changes, or leave comments as usual. Upload the reviewed DOCX and Claude can continue from that version instead of an outdated draft. DocketDrafter stores the document along with the firm's formatting and court conventions.

Your firm does. The playbook is built from your prior work, drafting rules, approved citations, and review history. DocketDrafter hosts and maintains it, but the work product and drafting knowledge remain your firm's asset. We can provide the underlying data if you ever leave the platform.

At the attorney’s request, DocketDrafter gives Claude a structured citation-review workflow. Claude can assign small groups of cases to independent reviewer agents, require each reviewer to read the full brief and source opinions, and flag issues for attorney review. Attorneys remain responsible for the research and final filing.

Yes. Supported brief templates generate a table of contents from the document headings and a categorized table of authorities from cited cases, statutes, rules, and other authorities.

DocketDrafter is built primarily for court-document workflows. That includes pleadings, motions, briefs, petitions, affidavits, proposed orders, related filing packages, and supported official forms. We can start with standard templates for a supported jurisdiction, adapt documents your firm already uses, or configure a recurring official form workflow.

Yes. Each document drafted through DocketDrafter can become part of the firm library, so future matters can start from the closest approved answer, motion, complaint, discovery demand, stipulation, or letter.

Yes. One of the main benefits is turning one attorney's AI workflow into a shared firm system. Other attorneys and staff can work from the same examples, rules, and review history without becoming prompt engineers.

Each firm has its own isolated, versioned home for its playbook, matters, documents, and history. Data is encrypted at rest, never used to train models by DocketDrafter, and firm work can be deleted within 30 days after leaving the platform.

No. DocketDrafter is focused on drafting: firm playbooks, prior work, templates, version history, citation review, and Word/PDF output. It can complement practice-management tools, but it does not replace docketing, calendaring, or case management software.

DocketDrafter is Claude-first today. The playbook is designed to be model-portable as agent apps mature, but Claude is currently the best-supported working interface.