Work like an AI-native law firm.
Without building the system yourself.

No. You do not need to program, create skills, or become a prompt engineer. We connect your assistant, provide live training, and help attorneys and staff learn the prompting and review basics through real legal work.

Yes. Each firm has its own isolated, versioned workspace. Your documents, templates, and drafting rules are confidential, never shared with another firm, and never used to train a model. Your firm owns what it puts in and the documents it drafts. Data is encrypted at rest, and if you ever leave, we can provide the underlying data and delete firm work within 30 days.

DocketDrafter works with Claude Cowork, ChatGPT Work, Claude Code, Codex, Viktor, and other supported agents. Your firm can use the same maintained workspace without rebuilding its document system around each assistant.

Nothing is required to begin with a supported New York, California, or Texas workspace. Tell us where you practice and the documents you prepare. You can add preferred templates, letterhead, prior work, and firm guidance when useful.

No. Word remains the review surface your lawyers and co-counsel already know. Edit text, use Track Changes, or leave comments as usual. Upload the reviewed DOCX and Claude or ChatGPT can continue from that version instead of an outdated draft. DocketDrafter stores the document along with the firm's formatting and court conventions.

At the attorney’s request, DocketDrafter gives Claude or ChatGPT a structured citation-review workflow. The assistant can assign small groups of cases to independent reviewer agents, require each reviewer to read the full brief and source opinions, and flag issues for attorney review. Attorneys remain responsible for the research and final filing.

Yes. Supported brief templates generate a table of contents from the document headings and a categorized table of authorities from cited cases, statutes, rules, and other authorities.

DocketDrafter is built primarily for court-document workflows. That includes pleadings, motions, briefs, petitions, affidavits, proposed orders, related filing packages, and supported official forms. It also covers the drafting around a filing: discovery demands, stipulations, and letters. We can start with standard templates for a supported jurisdiction, adapt documents your firm already uses, or configure a recurring official form workflow.

Yes. Each document drafted through DocketDrafter can become part of your firm library, so a new matter can start from the closest approved answer, motion, complaint, discovery demand, stipulation, or letter.

Yes. One of the main benefits is turning one attorney's AI workflow into a shared firm system. Other attorneys and staff can work from the same examples, rules, and review history without becoming prompt engineers.

You can, and some firms start there. The cost shows up later, in upkeep: court templates and forms to find and keep current, Word formatting to fix, and a separate setup for each assistant your team uses. Usually one attorney ends up owning all of it. DocketDrafter maintains that layer instead, and the same workspace works across supported assistants.

No. DocketDrafter is focused on drafting: the firm workspace, prior work, templates, version history, citation review, and Word/PDF output. It can complement practice-management tools, but it does not replace docketing, calendaring, or case management software.